On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:32:21PM -0500, Da' Kool Cat wrote: >At 12:14 PM 1/4/02 -0800, you wrote: >>make IS_AFFECTED(ch) a function that handles asll 4 IS_AFFECTED >>flags, and it will save you time. so like AFF_FLAGGED(ch, AFF_INVIS) would >>return TRUE or FALSE depending on if they were invis or not. It would save >>you some trouble in the long run. > > All of the recent suggestions have involved arrays, and a macro that >handles all of them. Last time I checked this is exactly how the 128bit >patch works, and you shouldn't have any trouble compiling that with cygwin >(what problems did you have?). If you can figure out how to solve your >situation, then patching 128bits into your mud should be easy enough >(hand-patch it, don't do it with the patch program) even if you don't use >the patch itself you could see how it's been done. Don't know about the 128 bit patch, I forget it, but another thing with the way I suggested, need more, increase one define and you have another 32/64 (depending on type) bits available. -mike -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | | Newbie List: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/circle-newbies/ | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 06/25/03 PDT