There are a few MUDs out there which don't conform completely to such standards. One local CircleMUD 2.2 implementation doesn't seem to allow callers to access it for free; I was considering approaching them about it. Could do that soon... I'm not sure how enforced the license is, but it's a matter of respect for the programmers/developers. ... > Let me sum up NoMUD for the rest of the list here, a MUD with no > credits on the screen, appears to have three "major" changes (100 levels, > races, and more classes), accepts donations, doesn't have a coder, but is > frequently changed and "heavily modified"? > > Hm, so, so far it breaks the DIKU and Circle 3.0 (there is one, > right?) licenses, it doesn't have a coder but is "frequently updated", > has some nice races, but classes for dragons/vampires?! A dragon is a > dragon and a vampire is a vampire, IMHO. When was the last time you saw > a dragon and a vampire together anyway? Not that I *wouldn't* do it > (but, I have a theme), just out of sync since dragon stories date back > way before vampires. Hm, is this the MUD that said they were a CircleMUD > but not a DIKU? > > So, all the offense intended. I don't really care about your theme > or features, it might be a decent MUD if, of course, it followed the > licenses...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/18/00 PST